Bible-Saturated vs. Bible-Based

Greg Strand – June 28, 2013 Leave a comment

When John Piper was asked in an interview which theologian of the past he would like to visit, it is no surprise he stated Jonathan Edwards. This explanation, which was part of his response, is compelling.

Edwards’ mind was uncommonly capable of holding complexities of reasoning long enough to sort them into threads that he could then weave into compelling arguments for great biblical truth. But what gave explosive power to this use of reasoning was how Bible saturated it was, not just that it was Bible-based. Many scholars say their work is based on biblical truth. But you will look in vain for any clear evidence of that. It is as if the contemporary thinkers feel the need to hide the Bible lest they be accused of proof-texting. Edwards was not so insecure. He had more respect and confidence in the Word of God.

Though not many have been blessed with the mind of Edwards (or Piper for that matter), it does explain why those of us not so blessed need to read people like Edwards. They help us to think long, hard and deep about the Bible, God and biblical truth.

I am also taken with how Edwards was Bible-saturated, not just Bible-based. The difference can be subtle, but profound. And anyone who is Bible-saturated can quickly discern the difference. The former is a result of being immersed in the text of Scripture, praying over, pondering, studying, reflecting. It approaches it as a primary source. The latter is a result of knowing Scripture, more often theology and theological systems (which are important, but as a second step from the Scriptures, which can only be faithfully articulated from spending time in the Scriptures). It often approaches Scripture as a secondary source.

In looking at these two points, read the Bible first, not Edwards. Read Edwards after you have read the Bible. And read people like Edwards because they will cause you to go back to the Bible, not away from it.

Finally, it is an exhortation to many who are insecure or doubt the sufficiency of the Scriptures. It is the Word of God that is inspired, inerrant, complete, final and sufficient (Ps. 119:160; Prov. 30:5; 2 Tim. 3:16-17; 2 Pet. 1:20-21). It is living and active (Heb. 4:12). It is the hammer that breaks into pieces the rocks thrown against it (Jer. 23:29). God’s Word does not need an apology. It is our life (Dt. 32:47; Matt. 4:4)! Therefore, it must be humbly believed, faithfully submitted to and boldly proclaimed.

 

Greg Strand

Posts

Affectionately called “Walking Bible” by his youngest daughter, Greg Strand has a ministry history that goes back to 1982. Since that time, he has served in local church ministry in a variety of ministry capacities: youth pastor, associate pastor of adult ministries and senior pastor. He is currently the EFCA's Executive Director of Theology and Credentialing. Greg reads voraciously and never stops learning — a passion reflected in the overflowing bookshelves that spill from his library to multiple offices. And he could tell you about each of those books! His hunger for learning pales in contrast to his great love for God and for teaching the Word of God.

No Comments

Be the first to start the conversation.

Leave a Reply

Text formatting is available via select HTML. <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*